4 ms·
> if there's a "true low level language" for today I'd like to hear about it "Steel Bank Common Lisp: because sometimes C abstracts away too much" https://www.
by snaky 7y ago
> if there's a "true low level language" for today I'd like to hear about it
"Steel Bank Common Lisp: because sometimes C abstracts away too much" https://www.pvk.ca/Blog/2014/03/15/sbcl-the-ultimate-assembly-code-breadboard/ https://www.pvk.ca/Blog/2014/03/15/sbcl-the-ultimate-assembl...
ATS - C plus everything you could get from modern types, including type-safe pointer arithmetics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt0OQb1DBko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt0OQb1DBko
Compiling Haskell to hardware http://conal.net/blog/posts/haskell-to-hardware-via-cccs http://conal.net/blog/posts/haskell-to-hardware-via-cccs
- ori_b 7y agoI don't see how these get past the limitations of assembly (and C) language mentioned in the post above. None of those links seem to indicate anything about exposing the cache hierarchy or out of order execution to developers.