3 ms·
Sorry! I don't know which classification will fit my usecase. But, imagine building an application with strangers you don't trust. No one person is the owner an
by QueensGambit 7y ago
Sorry! I don't know which classification will fit my usecase. But, imagine building an application with strangers you don't trust. No one person is the owner and anyone can modify the application in their local repository and send a pull request to merge it into the master branch. Since no one owns the application, I want atleast 50% of the application collaborators to accept the pull request. This way, integrity of the application can be maintained.
Is this a good fit for one of the blockchain classification?
- verdverm 7y agoNo. Imagine needing N/2+1 people to sign off on a PR. What happens when the project gets to 10 or 100 contributors? How long would a PR take, how many of these people would have the context to sign off? Why are you intent on block chain? GitHub already allows for strangers to create PRs, but lets the owners maintain control of how those PRs are approved and merged.
- verdverm 7y agoBlockchain only provides trust in the source of the signature and integrity of the bytes. It does nothing for trusting individuals behind the keys or code. Centralized control is still better