3 ms·
Here are some things for you to think about. First, if you actually want to make an impact here, you shouldn't start off by antagonizing the people you're oste
by jmull 7y ago
Here are some things for you to think about.
First, if you actually want to make an impact here, you shouldn't start off by antagonizing the people you're ostensibly trying to reach. As it stands, your message is probably most helpful to pet industries, since it allows pet owners to dismiss good arguments about the environmental objections to pet ownership by painting them with the anger your post evokes.
So here are some details, if you're interested... your post irrelevant to the topic. You're conflating issues of feral animals with pets. Of course these are related, but you need to work through that if you want to make a cogent point. Using phrases like "like blindly their toy pets" undermines anything else you might say. It hurts any chance you have to make a sincere point since it's indistinguishable from trolling.
- 11235813213455 7y agoThanks, appreciate the advice, it's kind of a taboo topic
- rconti 7y agoMaybe it's just your method of presentation is taboo. And maybe you feed into your feelings of self-righteousness about your crusade(s) by intentionally evoking negative reactions from those you are trying to influence.
- 11235813213455 7y agoHonestly it's unintentional, I don't really understand the negative reactions. What I've wrote are not maybe's, it's facts about one of the ways to relieve the environment. It's just my sincere immediate reaction about "Pets insurances", it makes absolutely no sense to me in our environmental context. I can take as many downvotes as people want, but I just hope to at trigger a questioning, not hate