3 ms·
The alternatives are terrible chemically-speaking. A far worse compromise than a country switching form coal to renewables in most cases. Without any effect on
by ShorsHammer 7y ago
The alternatives are terrible chemically-speaking. A far worse compromise than a country switching form coal to renewables in most cases.
Without any effect on the atmosphere and the global agreement on it's detriment you would be certainly be using all these banned gases in your fridges and airconditioners. They are vastly superior from an engineering perspective which is why they were chosen in the first place.