4 ms·
> These are not unintended consequences OK, perhaps you personally have thought of all of those consequences and you actually want them. And you don't care abo
by gliese1337 7y ago
> These are not unintended consequences
OK, perhaps you personally have thought of all of those consequences and you actually want them. And you don't care about gender-based discrimination, only biological sex. But here's another potential side-effect:
The concept of "separate but equal" has already been thoroughly shot down with regard to racial discrimination. If the ERA were passed, I guarantee you will see legal challenges to "separate but equal" treatment of the sexes. Taking that to its logical extreme, that means the ERA could be reasonably interpreted to mean that it is illegal to have, e.g., separate men's and women's locker rooms in public schools.
And just imagine how many parents would be up in arms over their daughters being forced to share a locker room with teenage boys.
- belorn 7y agoThe issue of gendered locker rooms and bathrooms can be reduced to an economical problem of building personal unisex booths. It is a bit more expensive, through compared to the budget of building a whole school it is a very minor increase in construction costs. So the issue is an 0.(many zeros)1% increase in taxes to address that particular issue.