2 ms·
I don't understand people who are annoyed at Miss America for celebrating beauty. I would understand them if they were upset at the gratuitous nudity [0], but t
by sfaewrgfaegw 7y ago
I don't understand people who are annoyed at Miss America for celebrating beauty. I would understand them if they were upset at the gratuitous nudity [0], but that doesn't even register today - we're saturated with scantly clad people celebrating themselves in public.
Beauty if a gift. I'm a overjoyed if someone tells me my daughter is beautiful, she really is, but I don't let people photograph her, never-mind allow her to be in a pageant. But there's nothing wrong in being beautiful. It's a gift.
Nor does being smart intrinsically make the person worthy. Intelligence is also a gift, a good one, but it hardly makes the holder a good person. So I don't celebrate someone for their academic achievements. Big deal.
Instead I celebrate people who, with their gifts, work for others. Yes, even personal beauty and grace can be used for this purpose (see Audrey Hepburn). A person with a 250 IQ and ten PhDs means nothing to me if they're the re-incarnation of Robert McNamara.
[0] A "little black dress" like Audrey Hepburn's and with her grace is far more revealing of beauty than a bikini. The bikini seems to be about detecting "flaws" like you would a horse at a market.
- mikestew 7y agoCould be generational. Odds are, I’ve got ten, twenty or more years on you. To me, it has nothing to do with beauty other than: “this one of your few options as a woman. Better look pretty. And dance or twirl a baton.” And we put it on national TV. It was propaganda, IMO. (I’m probably way overreaching on that one.) Putting lipstick on that pig with a little “science” doesn’t fool me. The big deal being made kinda drives my point home.