4 ms·
>> So embrace your limitations and wallow in the cheap and effortless, because you can never do better than that. That’s not what I said. I said this is what k
by heavenlyblue 7y ago
>> So embrace your limitations and wallow in the cheap and effortless, because you can never do better than that.
That’s not what I said. I said this is what kind of feelings it makes me remember.
It doesn’t mean I think that life has to be cheap and effortless per se. Yet I would appreciate art that reminds me of these feelings?
You are your typical art academician who having studied art now thinks they know better than others. I don’t think you do.
Did you go for computer science because it pays better? So who’s truly cynical here now? I went for computer science because I was good at it since the age of 11. It’s my passion and I have a sense of respect for people who earned their name in other industries, even if they did so not exactly through the most straightforward methods.
You may say it’s bullshit. But so is Steve Jobs? After all, he died because he didn’t do chemo at the right time, instead going for yoga.
- YeGoblynQueenne 7y ago>> That’s not what I said. To clarify, the sentence you quote referred to my interpretation of Pollock's outlook, not to something you said. I'm guessing you misunderstood my comment as a personal attack on you and you chose to escalate? Otherwise I can't explain the sudden personal tone of your comment. Did I cause confusion by using "you" and "yours" in the general sense?