It's not about the threshold of validity. It's about the threshold dose used, whose psychoactive effects are generally placed at higher doses. There is no valu

It's not about the threshold of validity. It's about the threshold dose used, whose psychoactive effects are generally placed at higher doses. There is no value in anecdotal data when this is something that can be properly measured, especially when it has to do with medical science and people's lives are involved. OP is making bogus, unsubstantiated claims and does not need to be defended.