3 ms·
A Reusable Scalable Intelligent System (e.g. for pain management or dementia management) is not a human equivalent. You didn't give any reason why you think th
by ProfHewitt 7y ago
A Reusable Scalable Intelligent System (e.g. for pain management or dementia management) is not a human equivalent.
You didn't give any reason why you think that technology in the preprint cannot be implemented by 2025.
- yters 7y agoTo justify the feasibility of the MORI system the preprint draws numerous analogies to human intellectual capabilities like adaptability to a changing information environment and dealing with inconsistent information. Humans can certainly handle these scenarios, but why assume such intellectual capabilities are computable? We have great difficulty emulating any sort of human intellectual ability with computation, with a near zero success rate, and only success in very narrow and highly consistent domains. I don't see any reason why our success rate with AI tech will increase when the domain becomes broad, changes rapidly, and is inconsistent.