This is a thought-provoking response and does make me reconsider my position. It doesn’t please me, but perhaps we do need to encourage market pressures that fo

This is a thought-provoking response and does make me reconsider my position. It doesn’t please me, but perhaps we do need to encourage market pressures that force Mozilla to create a better product. However, as I said in my above post, my objection to Brave largely stems from how it is marketed and promoted. I’ll re-iterate: People try to sell it as the “pro-decentralization” and “good web citizen” browser. Brave isn’t doing anything compelling enough to earn that status in my eyes. I am not going to argue about how much Mozilla innovates. Rust is pretty cool — I agree they could do more. The people pushing me to use Brave seem to want me to do so as an act of charity. I will re-evaluate my choice to charitably direct my web traffic through Firefox, but, to be honest, my first choice otherwise still would not be Brave.