4 ms·
Regarding databases across machines, would not Syncthing [1] work for this? Storage is fairly cheap these days, so having an exact copy of everything on two mac
by ninjin 7y ago
Regarding databases across machines, would not Syncthing [1] work for this? Storage is fairly cheap these days, so having an exact copy of everything on two machines would not be that bad.
[1]: https://syncthing.net https://syncthing.net
On a personal note, I desperately want to get into using darktable as Lightroom is the last piece proprietary software that I rely on. However, it seems Leica M8 support is still “not there” [2]. They do link to how to help out by adding support at the top of the page, but as mine was stolen two years ago I am not much help and I do want to be able to support my range of cameras dating back to 2006.
[2]: https://www.darktable.org/resources/camera-support https://www.darktable.org/resources/camera-support
- brudgers 7y agoThe three things on the list are conveniences not necessities. They are features of individual modules that provide a UI over several pixel pipeline operations that can be done in other ways. White balance can be done without using the presets (that's mostly how I do it). Denoising can be done with tools besides "profiled denoise." I do use it. I often shoot slow lenses at high ISO's (1600-12800) and it was the easiest tool to learn without understanding what I was doing. I've never used custom matrix because my camera isn't supported. I don't miss it. You might I guess. But none of these are core features. And none are the only way to accomplish the things they do.