3 ms·
There's two arguments here, 1. whether the claims are factual and 2. whether the Times is "forcing events and personalities into a narrow, pre-conceived frame t
by leftyted 7y ago
There's two arguments here, 1. whether the claims are factual and 2. whether the Times is "forcing events and personalities into a narrow, pre-conceived frame that bore little relation to the reality before him".
My post focused on 2.
- geofft 7y agoI don't think that you can force much of anything into a frame that bears little relation to reality if the thing you're forcing is, in fact, reality. It is certainly reasonable to criticize a journalist or journalistic organization for only pursuing stories of a particular ideological bent, but it's quite different to accuse them of pursuing incorrect stories. If you mean to only do the former, then I misinterpreted what you meant.