4 ms·

I don't want Amazon's website to change. It works well as it is, I certainly never find myself wanting something it doesn't currently do.

heavyset_go 7y ago
> It works well as it is Search is horribly broken, sorting is broken, ratings are broken, products are broken up into categories that don't make sense and searching and sorting between categories is broken.
- pmiller2 7y ago
  You just articulated basically every complaint I have about buying anything from Amazon. It seems unarguably true that I can’t buy anything from them if I can’t find it. So, why is it so hard to search for anything I don’t already know the exact name of?
  - heavyset_go 7y ago
    > It seems unarguably true that I can’t buy anything from them if I can’t find it. Most people are looking for the best value they can get at the lowest price they can find. Amazon's site makes that process difficult and nearly impossible. I can only speculate as to why that is.
  - krustyburger 7y ago
    So much of the result of a search is now explicitly advertising. Amazon now has a new incentive to sell ads and display those ads as often as possible, whereas before their only goal was to return relevant results to the customer making the search.
    - pmiller2 7y ago
      You can say the same about Google search, yet their organic results are still quite relevant. Isn’t Amazon supposed to be focusing on the customer?
- celticmusic 7y ago
  That hasn't been my experience at all, but the further point is that is all background stuff. They can improve the search without changing the UI, so it's not really a response to my point.
  - heavyset_go 7y ago
    It's very much a response to your point. From your original post: > It works well as it is, I certainly never find myself wanting something it doesn't currently do. You are talking about functionality, and I am responding about Amazon's functionality.
    - celticmusic 7y ago
      this is such a classless reply. You don't get to tell me what my point was and you certainly don't get to argue with me about what my point is. The person I responded to said the website hasn't changed. I read that as a redesign of the site itself. Now, there's nothing wrong if you read it differently. Where you stepped over the line is when you decided to argue with me about what my point is.
      - heavyset_go 7y ago
        > You don't get to tell me what my point was and you certainly don't get to argue with me about what my point is. You said one thing, which I replied to, and now you're claiming it's another thing. I'm not really sure what you expect when you do that.
        celticmusic 7y ago
        and this is how you get dismissed.
- minblaster 7y ago
  "Broken" is one-dimensional-black-and-white-thinking-speak for "works for most, most of the time, but has some behavior I don't like so it's 100% useless." So you can't perfectly compare an item that is cross-listed in multiple categories. Is that "broken", or not ideal? Even ratings, the worst thing about amazon, are "useful" in that you can instantly look at the distribution. All 5's and 1's? Product sucks.
  - heavyset_go 7y ago
    > "Broken" is one-dimensional-black-and-white-thinking-speak for "works for most, most of the time, but has some behavior I don't like so it's 100% useless." Please do not strawman my position just because you disagree with it. Sorting by price doesn't sort by price, sorting by average customer review doesn't sort by average customer review and so on. > So you can't perfectly compare an item that is cross-listed in multiple categories. Is that "broken", or not ideal? When the feature says "sort by price" and it doesn't sort by price, it is broken. I assume you work in software development, so you should know this. > Even ratings, the worst thing about amazon, are "useful" in that you can instantly look at the distribution. All 5's and 1's? Product sucks. This isn't even remotely true. I've come across hundreds of listings that have reviews for products that are clearly not the product in the listing. The fact that this is even allowed means that the rating system is broken.
BeetleB 7y ago
Problems with Amazon's website: - For a long time they performed poorly on Firefox. Opening multiple tabs would cause my PC to come to a crawl. They fixed this 1-2 years ago. - I used to be able to jump directly to reviews. Now it's multiple clicks away. One click to get to the review section. Then scroll down. Then click again. This is very annoying. - I don't get notified when someone replies to my review. The rest of the world solved this problem well over 15 years ago. - Lumping of quite different products into one listing, so when I'm reading reviews I can't easily tell if I'm reading the review for the product I want. - Way too many gamed reviews out there. Whole web sites exist to handle this problem that Amazon has. - Same item has multiple listings. Why? I could list all the other problems that their retail division has, but the above is just about the web site. Whenever I hear that they are Customer Obsessed, I wonder which world they live in. As someone who buys stuff from them, and as someone who has sold stuff through them, neither experience could be classified as caring much for the customer. Their retail division really does remind me of MS Windows and its stagnation, where MS wouldn't improve anything because of their dominance.

heavyset_go 7y ago

> It works well as it is Search is horribly broken, sorting is broken, ratings are broken, products are broken up into categories that don't make sense and searching and sorting between categories is broken.

pmiller2 7y ago
You just articulated basically every complaint I have about buying anything from Amazon. It seems unarguably true that I can’t buy anything from them if I can’t find it. So, why is it so hard to search for anything I don’t already know the exact name of?
- heavyset_go 7y ago
  > It seems unarguably true that I can’t buy anything from them if I can’t find it. Most people are looking for the best value they can get at the lowest price they can find. Amazon's site makes that process difficult and nearly impossible. I can only speculate as to why that is.
- krustyburger 7y ago
  So much of the result of a search is now explicitly advertising. Amazon now has a new incentive to sell ads and display those ads as often as possible, whereas before their only goal was to return relevant results to the customer making the search.
  - pmiller2 7y ago
    You can say the same about Google search, yet their organic results are still quite relevant. Isn’t Amazon supposed to be focusing on the customer?
celticmusic 7y ago
That hasn't been my experience at all, but the further point is that is all background stuff. They can improve the search without changing the UI, so it's not really a response to my point.
- heavyset_go 7y ago
  It's very much a response to your point. From your original post: > It works well as it is, I certainly never find myself wanting something it doesn't currently do. You are talking about functionality, and I am responding about Amazon's functionality.
  - celticmusic 7y ago
    this is such a classless reply. You don't get to tell me what my point was and you certainly don't get to argue with me about what my point is. The person I responded to said the website hasn't changed. I read that as a redesign of the site itself. Now, there's nothing wrong if you read it differently. Where you stepped over the line is when you decided to argue with me about what my point is.
    - heavyset_go 7y ago
      > You don't get to tell me what my point was and you certainly don't get to argue with me about what my point is. You said one thing, which I replied to, and now you're claiming it's another thing. I'm not really sure what you expect when you do that.
      - celticmusic 7y ago
        and this is how you get dismissed.
minblaster 7y ago
"Broken" is one-dimensional-black-and-white-thinking-speak for "works for most, most of the time, but has some behavior I don't like so it's 100% useless." So you can't perfectly compare an item that is cross-listed in multiple categories. Is that "broken", or not ideal? Even ratings, the worst thing about amazon, are "useful" in that you can instantly look at the distribution. All 5's and 1's? Product sucks.
- heavyset_go 7y ago
  > "Broken" is one-dimensional-black-and-white-thinking-speak for "works for most, most of the time, but has some behavior I don't like so it's 100% useless." Please do not strawman my position just because you disagree with it. Sorting by price doesn't sort by price, sorting by average customer review doesn't sort by average customer review and so on. > So you can't perfectly compare an item that is cross-listed in multiple categories. Is that "broken", or not ideal? When the feature says "sort by price" and it doesn't sort by price, it is broken. I assume you work in software development, so you should know this. > Even ratings, the worst thing about amazon, are "useful" in that you can instantly look at the distribution. All 5's and 1's? Product sucks. This isn't even remotely true. I've come across hundreds of listings that have reviews for products that are clearly not the product in the listing. The fact that this is even allowed means that the rating system is broken.

BeetleB 7y ago

Problems with Amazon's website: - For a long time they performed poorly on Firefox. Opening multiple tabs would cause my PC to come to a crawl. They fixed this 1-2 years ago. - I used to be able to jump directly to reviews. Now it's multiple clicks away. One click to get to the review section. Then scroll down. Then click again. This is very annoying. - I don't get notified when someone replies to my review. The rest of the world solved this problem well over 15 years ago. - Lumping of quite different products into one listing, so when I'm reading reviews I can't easily tell if I'm reading the review for the product I want. - Way too many gamed reviews out there. Whole web sites exist to handle this problem that Amazon has. - Same item has multiple listings. Why? I could list all the other problems that their retail division has, but the above is just about the web site. Whenever I hear that they are Customer Obsessed, I wonder which world they live in. As someone who buys stuff from them, and as someone who has sold stuff through them, neither experience could be classified as caring much for the customer. Their retail division really does remind me of MS Windows and its stagnation, where MS wouldn't improve anything because of their dominance.