3 ms·
As to your first point, I suppose I kind of assumed the readers here were familiar with MOS Technology and their work in integrating DRAM onto the same die as a
by retrac 7y ago
As to your first point, I suppose I kind of assumed the readers here were familiar with MOS Technology and their work in integrating DRAM onto the same die as a processor, along with advances in ROM manufacture, and the general push to system-on-a-chip integration.
To be clear, Chuck Peddle also helped design chips like the RRIOT (1 KB of ROM, 64 bytes of RAM, a parallel IO port and a timer). A machine like the KIM-1 (also of Peddle's design) would not have been possible without the RRIOT chip, anymore than without the 6502. I just find it skewed that we all focus on the microprocessor he designed, when a chip like the RRIOT was just as important. Microprocessors are pretty nifty indeed, but they'd be useless without IO and memory just as cheap and small to go with them.
- jacquesm 7y agoThe crowd on HN ranges from people born after the millenium to those that cut their teeth on 8 bitters and even older people. I started out on the KIM-1, I think you mean the 6530. Your comment above reads a lot nicer than the ones preceding it, and yes, they needed IO and memory but without them that IO and memory would have never happened and the processors were the flagships of their respective companies.