4 ms·
>These perspectives aren't necessarily wrong, but you can't be a good journalist if you've internalized them. In what way can both of those things hold? If the
by ivanbakel 7y ago
>These perspectives aren't necessarily wrong, but you can't be a good journalist if you've internalized them.
In what way can both of those things hold? If the perspectives aren't wrong, what bearing do they have on good journalism?
- leftyted 7y agoGood journalists have to believe in objective truth and the possibility of impartiality. There may be no such thing as objective truth or impartiality. If that's the case, then these things are delusions that are required for good journalism.
- ivanbakel 7y agoWhat benefit do those ideas have to journalism, and what more makes them required? I don't see what positive impact they would have on me as a reader.