3 ms·
Authors could also use an automated system that processes these complaints, applies them unilaterally to the manuscript (false positive non-typos be damned) and
by rzzzt 7y ago
Authors could also use an automated system that processes these complaints, applies them unilaterally to the manuscript (false positive non-typos be damned) and uploads a modified version.
- egdod 7y agoThat seems even more abuse-prone.
- owl57 7y agoYes. I still don't understand why Wikipedia doesn't fall apart. But pretty sure it doesn't.
- gbear605 7y agoOnly because there are a number of people who monitor all the pages. It couldn’t (currently) be done with an automated setup, as shown by the legion of bots that monitor as well and still don’t do a perfect job.
- lolc 7y agoRight on empowering random Amazon users to edit one's book with no oversight. The customer always knows best.
- rzzzt 7y agoIt doesn't really matter. Amazon is happy, the customer is happy, sales are coming in, and when the book finally does not make any sense whatsoever, the original version can be uploaded.