hummm.... I partly agree with you now. I don't agree that "bilingual advantage" is necessarily subjective per se. But if you were to say "the conclusions are o

hummm.... I partly agree with you now. I don't agree that "bilingual advantage" is necessarily subjective per se. But if you were to say "the conclusions are only valid insofar as the chosen metrics to measure are representative of an underlying bilingual advantage" - then I would totally agree. I guess my view is that this latter question is very subtle, and something for a domain expert to gauge. I'm not in a position to gauge it, and this is the point where I do to some degree have to trust the peer-review process, as flawed as it may be!