3 ms·

I don't find that very descriptive. I still don't understand why Mozilla changed its mind about how much the Debian patches changed. I think it's just about cha

I don't find that very descriptive. I still don't understand why Mozilla changed its mind about how much the Debian patches changed. I think it's just about changing of the guard at Mozilla or something. I guess we'll have to hope someone at Mozilla doesn't get picky again and decide to enforce their trademark policy, which I think says Debian is in violation of, but being tolerated.

Argorak 7y ago
The main license problem that Debian had was the _license of the logo_. This flaw is remedied. (and Rust hasn't made that mistake) There was no change of guard, just a very long discussion on how you can make some of the stars align: Mozillas interest that things shipped as "Firefox" are something they can vouch for and Debians interest to use them as free software.
- jordigh 7y ago
  If the problem was the logo, why change the name?
  - Macha 7y ago
    Debian felt they couldn't ship the logo because of its licensing restrictions. Mozilla felt changing the logo fell outside their trademark guidelines to still call it Firefox.