It is necessary to have multiple solutions. There needn’t be just one. We need to restore forest cover for reasons I’ve responded to you on in another thread.

It is necessary to have multiple solutions. There needn’t be just one. We need to restore forest cover for reasons I’ve responded to you on in another thread. We need to have low carbon energy - I’m one of those coming around to Nuclear energy. We need to stop pollution via plastics. We need to stop greenhouse gas emissions and figure out solutions to address those gases that we’ve already released. Your reminder about the wild fires dumping half the years CO2 into the air the the span of a few days is a sobering thought. But, your general message (despite your clarifications) seems to suggest that we might just as well get rid of all trees and artificially supply ourselves with oxygen.