Just a general comment about the dismissal of the idea of "real food" . . . Just because people can't agree about where the grey areas are versus where the def

Just a general comment about the dismissal of the idea of "real food" . . . Just because people can't agree about where the grey areas are versus where the defined areas are does not mean that there are no areas worth defining or that we should avoid defining those areas for ourselves because other people disagree. It's sort of like driving speed. Some people believe that average faster speeds are safe, but people who drive faster than they drive are unsafe. Other people will think slower speeds are safe and anyone who drives faster than they drive are unsafe. This doesn't mean that there aren't "real" safe speeds or that the idea of a safe driving speed is meaningless. We can still get closer to real food or real safe driving speeds even if our targets vary.