> Well, arguably that's true in the webcrap space. (...) crap on top of crap Not that you're wrong per say, but personally, I think you should take a look at t

> Well, arguably that's true in the webcrap space. (...) crap on top of crap Not that you're wrong per say, but personally, I think you should take a look at the HN guidelines. Like don't be snarky, and don't post shallow dismissals. Just categorizing the arguably most popular way of building software as "crap" doesn't seem like thoughtful or curious conversation.