2 ms·
His entire point is that it's Oracle being disingenuous here, and the entire article goes on to explain that reasoning.
by andrewljohnson 16y ago
His entire point is that it's Oracle being disingenuous here, and the entire article goes on to explain that reasoning.
- biot 16y agoThe way I see it is that Oracle is continuing to develop the project under the Hudson name. The bulk of the community has decided to move the project elsewhere and continue development under a new name, Jenkins. Fair enough, they are parting ways. At this point arguing over who forked who seems (to this outsider) like the old Reese's commercials arguing whether "you got chocolate on my peanut butter" or whether "you got peanut butter on my chocolate".