> vaping once optimized over a few device generations has the potential to be at least as harmful as hard drugs (heroin/coke/etc) Vaping itself doesn’t have an

> vaping once optimized over a few device generations has the potential to be at least as harmful as hard drugs (heroin/coke/etc) Vaping itself doesn’t have any proven harmful affects. I’m not saying it definitely won’t turn out to have any at all, but nicotine is not carcinogenic, and doesn’t have anywhere near the same potential to harm as the narcotics you mentioned. This is really just speculation. > An outright ban might not be advisable, but banning certain chemicals or device designs might be preferable. Sounds good to me. I’ve got no issue with the FDA making sure my food is safe to consume, nor any with this suggestion. It’s a sin tax or other ridiculous restrictions that seem unjustified to me. I expect the truth behind a lot of the regulation talk is really that the government doesn’t want to lose tobacco tax revenue. Which really just makes the whole thing even more tyrannical.