4 ms·
It seems you didn't read the article closely. They didn't just plagiarize the slides, they neutered them, and then attempted to pass them off as Stanford endor
by chottocharaii 7y ago
It seems you didn't read the article closely.
They didn't just plagiarize the slides, they neutered them, and then attempted to pass them off as Stanford endorsed research; all without permission from the author.
- allovernow 7y ago> they neutered them So they're derivative works of PPT slides? Does that count as theft? How much do you need to change a slide before it's a new work? >attempted to pass them off as Stanford endorsed research As in falsifying a conclusion or reinterpreting the data?
- pesfandiar 7y agoI did read the article. All that is just a more unethical strain of plagiarism to me. I however agree with the other comment below that this report could go toward painting a full picture of what kind of company we're dealing with.