3 ms·
I would say there's a massive difference between contributing back code and paying taxes. Public companies have a FIDUCIARY duty to provide maximum value to sh
by mikece 7y ago
I would say there's a massive difference between contributing back code and paying taxes. Public companies have a FIDUCIARY duty to provide maximum value to shareholders, and that's been the "legal justification" for the FAANGs to engage in the "reverse Irish, Dutch sandwich" scheme to pay zero taxes. Meanwhile, shareholders don't care about code licensing as long as the company isn't giving away the secret sauce under F/OSS terms. Netflix dude above mentioned how much they contribute back; the "enlightened self-interest" of the BSD world encourages these companies to contribute as much as possible back to the project so their diffs in pulling down updates are minimal. If they go asshole and keep everything private they are making their own headache worse when updating or locking themselves in the past.
- andrekandre 7y ago> FIDUCIARY duty to provide maximum value to shareholders i’m not sure that’s exactly true is it? [0] or at least it seems quite murky (case-by-case, state-by-state) [1] [0] https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/16/what-are-corporations-obligations-to-shareholders/corporations-dont-have-to-maximize-profits https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/16/what-are-co... [1] https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5dc3f206-0fcc-469c-bd66-66e83def2fcd https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5dc3f206-0fcc...