I like this take the best. "Rather than a neat tree of discrete universes that don't interact after they branch, the universe could be much fuzzier mess of con

I like this take the best. "Rather than a neat tree of discrete universes that don't interact after they branch, the universe could be much fuzzier mess of conflicting realities that can intercommunicate". Very well said and, in my opinion, this agrees most with my sense of how the world works. In a way, reminds me of Rupert Sheldrake's work a bit, atleast in the sense that his biological work, despite mostly lacking known mechanisms, does seem to belong more to a universe that's a "fuzzier mess of conflicting realities that can intercommunicate".