2 ms·
This is my thought. I suspect these are asteroids. The tell is whether the stars show up on plates, say, a year later. If so, then they're not asteroids. Howev
by teilo 7y ago
This is my thought. I suspect these are asteroids. The tell is whether the stars show up on plates, say, a year later. If so, then they're not asteroids.
However, that seems to have been ruled out in the Astronomical Journal article:
"Given the exposure time of 45 minutes of the POSS-I E red image, if our object were an asteroid that quickly moved out of the field, it would have left a stripe (and not be point-like)." (Page 5)
"The exposure time for the red image is about 50 minutes. If the object were an asteroid and was quickly moving through the field of the red image in a few minutes, then it would be elongated on the plate. However, this object is point-like. In addition, the candidate is anomalously red and not seen in the blue band, which further decreases the likelihood that it is an asteroid." (Page 13)
- garmaine 7y agoThat doesn’t rule out foreground objects at all. Kuiper belt objects are distinctly red, as we learned from New Horizons, and so far away that they wouldn’t noticeably move over 45min.
- teilo 7y agoThe question is whether such Kuiper objects would show up on the old POSS plates. I don't know enough about that, so I yield to those who do. It certainly seems a more plausible explanation.