3 ms·
I bet some of them are moving a little faster than we expected them to and are just not where we last saw them. Creepy nonetheless.
by jagger27 7y ago
I bet some of them are moving a little faster than we expected them to and are just not where we last saw them. Creepy nonetheless.
- ceejayoz 7y agoI don't think that's likely. It takes the closest star 5,000 years to move the distance our moon covers in the night's sky. Video of ten years worth here: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10160104518220167 https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10160104518220167
- ben_w 7y agoI was thinking that, but if these objects are much closer than expected, small physical motion could be a large angular motion. I don’t know if that would be enough to explain them away.
- hcs 7y agoMaybe, indeed the article says: > It could also be a dull star we assumed was farther away and has just moved too far to be noticed.