Why did he value Microsoft over Their? There is something in his character that held in higher regard one decision over the other, there's no exploration of wha

Why did he value Microsoft over Their? There is something in his character that held in higher regard one decision over the other, there's no exploration of what caused the conflict in the first instance and a likelihood it will happen again. What should he have done with himself at that point and all future similar points where he has opportunity again? This post seems to be more about signalling than lessons learned. Better luck next time!