3 ms·
OCaml somewhat tries to be familiar for OOPs, but it _is_ first and foremost a functional language. Personally, I am learning it now, and I think rather than i
by Jenz 7y ago
OCaml somewhat tries to be familiar for OOPs, but it _is_ first and foremost a functional language.
Personally, I am learning it now, and I think rather than it being a stepping stone between OOP and FP, it might as well be its own separate and hybrid paragdim; I find purer FP languages like Haskell much more intuitive than the mix of modules, objects, types and classes of OCaml.
Though do not get me wrong, OCaml is an amazing language. It just stands rather by itself.
Pardon my terrible english.