2 ms·
I also read it. You have to be really careful with lots of the fact given in that book in the end, they focus on some specific numbers that are indeed positive
by edhelas 7y ago
I also read it. You have to be really careful with lots of the fact given in that book in the end, they focus on some specific numbers that are indeed positive but forget that the general tendency is definitely not going that way. It gives a false sense of "everything is going great".
I think that the best example was about the fact that some animal species are actually going back in number (in France we have that with the reintroduction of the wolves in the mountains). They gave a few example with species that had specific plans to protect them. The general fact is that 60% of the insect (not species, the total number of individuals) are gone in 40 years and 52% of the vertebrates in 40 years.
By only focusing on those "facts" you are actually not trying to understand the complexity of the current system and missing some really important points that are, indeed, not positive.
We are aiming at +4°C, some reports says 6-7°C at the end of the century, that is not something positive and we need to act on that for example.