3 ms·
I'm not convinced that we need huge proprietary time-wasters to have conversations with each other. There are circumstances in life when long TV shows may be fu
by stereolambda 7y ago
I'm not convinced that we need huge proprietary time-wasters to have conversations with each other. There are circumstances in life when long TV shows may be fun and entertaining, but watching them shouldn't be expected. With my family, and random people met in places, I talk about real life that we have in common or wider societal trends. This can be instructive (about what people think) even if very light. I remember a guy complaining before an unrelated class that "computer people hunched over keyboards will take over everything". Little did he know.
You can say that real life stuff can be hot and divisive, but then pop culture can also. See how new Star Wars and recent blockbusters generated controversy and online culture wars. Handling people with opinions, and your own opinions, is a valuable skill nonetheless.
I am into music as well, as in listening to albums and records collecting, and am very happy that I don't have to know or listen to anything "mainstream" in particular. Free exploration is so much more pleasurable. I do share some of my tastes with people around me, but really a different little thing with each person.
- C1sc0cat 7y agoCommon cultural touch stones are more thigs like the St James Bible" the Classics etc. In the Uk it might be Last night of the Proms, Dr Who , Queens Speech, Test Cricket on the Radio, world service weather reports etc
- catalogia 7y agoYou don't need 'common cultural touch stones' when you have shared real life experiences.
- quotemstr 7y agoWhen you take away all other shared experience, what remains is politics, the nuts and bolts of running a society. We've seen a surge in political extremism lately; one thing that drives political extremism in general is the inability to share non-political experiences with one's political opponents.