6 ms·

he kept taking lsd trying to to recreate that specific feeling the trip can give you only to later learn you can get to that place without the drugs. i had no

he kept taking lsd trying to to recreate that specific feeling the trip can give you only to later learn you can get to that place without the drugs. i had no idea he had a debilitating stroke. imagine being someone who’s life is defined by your good ability to articulate ideas hard to explain and communicate with anyone and then instantly turn to someone who has trouble expressing your thoughts. and doing that 20 years. man getting old fucking blows

kick 7y ago
He found peace in the stroke. It wasn't entirely bad, and he'd probably laugh that you felt more strongly about it than he did. Here's an interesting interview with him on just that: https://www.readthespirit.com/explore/the-ram-dass-interview-on-polishing-the-mirror-you-cant-help-but-smile-hes-still-teaching-us/ https://www.readthespirit.com/explore/the-ram-dass-interview...
- lambdaba 7y ago
  Absolutely, there's an excellent documentary about this called Going Home https://www.netflix.com/title/80209895 https://www.netflix.com/title/80209895
  - workthrowaway 7y ago
    > ...Going Home OMG not familiar with the person being talked about but "going home" resonates with me. leonard cohen wrote some powerful songs in his old age and "going home" is one of them.
briga 7y ago
I wonder if the chronic LSD use and the stroke were related.
- lambdaba 7y ago
  There's absolutely no scientific basis for that, besides that I don't think he used LSD much if at all past the hippie period. Certainly not regularly (and there are people who have used LSD weekly for years with no apparent damage)
  - nyolfen 7y ago
    the nyt obituary mentioned that he used it a couple of times a year into old age
  - tim333 7y ago
    There are also many people who've used LSD a lot and end up with mental issues caused by the drugs. But not as far as I know, not strokes or anything like that.
- 9nGQluzmnq3M 7y ago
  LSD is used in ridiculously minute quantities, with standard doses measured in micrograms (millionths of a gram). It's astonishing enough that this can have a profound effect on the brain, but it's highly unlikely to cause physical damage to larger organs like the heart.
  - colordrops 7y ago
    The size of the dose is not a great measure of safety. Botulinum toxin has an LD50 in the nanograms, and several other toxins in the same range of LSD, that being micrograms. Now no strong evidence of toxicity has been found from LSD, but that's not due to it being taken in small doses.
  - papreclip 7y ago
    In theory, every LSD dose consumed is pure LSD. In practice there are many stand-ins that are cheaper and easier to produce. They have different tox profiles and one never knows what one is actually taking unless you run your samples through a battery of quantitative tests. The one or two field tests out there are easily fooled if the counterfeiter is of a mind to fool them
    - tim333 7y ago
      I'm not sure that's true for LSD. It's much stronger per mg than other such drugs and as a result tends to be added to other things rather than having things added to it.
      - papreclip 7y ago
        My understanding is that synthesizing even one atom of LSD is probably more expensive and difficult than making several grams of some NBOMe derivative. The production costs don't scale to zero and the synthesis itself is beyond the abilities of some "drug cooks" Don't have any personal experience. I was a grad student working on organic synthesis once but never did anything illegal
    - stjohnswarts 7y ago
- gxon 7y ago
  Certainly something that should be studied. Too bad the federal government in the US effectively banned any research into LSD for decades.
  - evancox100 7y ago
    So we should lift the ban on LSD research so that we can give people LSD and see if it increases their risk of stroke?
    - wool_gather 7y ago
      Correct; instead of armchair pharmacist-ing on some internet forum, we should collect actual data about its effects so that people can make more informed decisions about what/whether there are good uses for this chemical. Just like we do with other drugs.
      - evancox100 7y ago
        No, that's not what we do with other drugs. No one goes to an IRB with "We suspect this drug is bad for people, we should run a study to find out," and gets approval for that study. If you wanted to perform an observational study on whether or not people already consuming LSD are at heightened risk of stroke, I highly doubt the federal ban would affect that.
        wool_gather 7y ago
        There are lots of suspicions about how LSD might be good for people too; how do we figure out which suspicions are factual and not?
      - cyberpip 7y ago
        There are more and more studies emerging (see https://maps.org/research/ https://maps.org/research/ and https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/09/04/hopkins-launches-psychedelic-center/ https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/09/04/hopkins-launches-psychedelic-...). That said, Erowid, and anecdotal reports, can be very valuable as well.
- brodo 7y ago
  Strokes are _very_ common. It‘s the third most common cause for death (or something in that ballpark). A lot of the leading figures in psychedelics lived long lives. Incidentally, Alexander Shulgin also died at 88. Albert Hoffman lived to 104.
- brooklyndude 7y ago
  No.
loopz 7y ago
There's actually a quite interesting movie about Ram Dass, about his life before and after stroke. It became a revelation that continuing living required digging deeper, and made him question much of his past, acting like the famous yogis and fooling around. When high on spirit, one may become a bit arrogant and full of oneself. He got more or less to see himself as "no more enlightened" than others, realize more of being the same as others, conscious sameness. That being a yogi is about much more than being famous, wealthy or having good health, none of that actually. Lots of spiritual saints have had bad accidents and maladies in their life. Their power is often how to turn it to something deeper, meaningful, helping others and being inspirational - or just make a laugh about it. Ashtavakra was a total cripple (Ashtavakra means "8 knots" in the body), yet is studied and highly revered in India for his Gita.

kick 7y ago

He found peace in the stroke. It wasn't entirely bad, and he'd probably laugh that you felt more strongly about it than he did. Here's an interesting interview with him on just that: https://www.readthespirit.com/explore/the-ram-dass-interview-on-polishing-the-mirror-you-cant-help-but-smile-hes-still-teaching-us/ https://www.readthespirit.com/explore/the-ram-dass-interview...

lambdaba 7y ago
Absolutely, there's an excellent documentary about this called Going Home https://www.netflix.com/title/80209895 https://www.netflix.com/title/80209895
- workthrowaway 7y ago
  > ...Going Home OMG not familiar with the person being talked about but "going home" resonates with me. leonard cohen wrote some powerful songs in his old age and "going home" is one of them.

briga 7y ago

I wonder if the chronic LSD use and the stroke were related.

lambdaba 7y ago
There's absolutely no scientific basis for that, besides that I don't think he used LSD much if at all past the hippie period. Certainly not regularly (and there are people who have used LSD weekly for years with no apparent damage)
- nyolfen 7y ago
  the nyt obituary mentioned that he used it a couple of times a year into old age
- tim333 7y ago
  There are also many people who've used LSD a lot and end up with mental issues caused by the drugs. But not as far as I know, not strokes or anything like that.
9nGQluzmnq3M 7y ago
LSD is used in ridiculously minute quantities, with standard doses measured in micrograms (millionths of a gram). It's astonishing enough that this can have a profound effect on the brain, but it's highly unlikely to cause physical damage to larger organs like the heart.
- colordrops 7y ago
  The size of the dose is not a great measure of safety. Botulinum toxin has an LD50 in the nanograms, and several other toxins in the same range of LSD, that being micrograms. Now no strong evidence of toxicity has been found from LSD, but that's not due to it being taken in small doses.
- papreclip 7y ago
  In theory, every LSD dose consumed is pure LSD. In practice there are many stand-ins that are cheaper and easier to produce. They have different tox profiles and one never knows what one is actually taking unless you run your samples through a battery of quantitative tests. The one or two field tests out there are easily fooled if the counterfeiter is of a mind to fool them
  - tim333 7y ago
    I'm not sure that's true for LSD. It's much stronger per mg than other such drugs and as a result tends to be added to other things rather than having things added to it.
    - papreclip 7y ago
      My understanding is that synthesizing even one atom of LSD is probably more expensive and difficult than making several grams of some NBOMe derivative. The production costs don't scale to zero and the synthesis itself is beyond the abilities of some "drug cooks" Don't have any personal experience. I was a grad student working on organic synthesis once but never did anything illegal
  - stjohnswarts 7y ago
gxon 7y ago
Certainly something that should be studied. Too bad the federal government in the US effectively banned any research into LSD for decades.
- evancox100 7y ago
  So we should lift the ban on LSD research so that we can give people LSD and see if it increases their risk of stroke?
  - wool_gather 7y ago
    Correct; instead of armchair pharmacist-ing on some internet forum, we should collect actual data about its effects so that people can make more informed decisions about what/whether there are good uses for this chemical. Just like we do with other drugs.
    - evancox100 7y ago
      No, that's not what we do with other drugs. No one goes to an IRB with "We suspect this drug is bad for people, we should run a study to find out," and gets approval for that study. If you wanted to perform an observational study on whether or not people already consuming LSD are at heightened risk of stroke, I highly doubt the federal ban would affect that.
      - wool_gather 7y ago
        There are lots of suspicions about how LSD might be good for people too; how do we figure out which suspicions are factual and not?
    - cyberpip 7y ago
      There are more and more studies emerging (see https://maps.org/research/ https://maps.org/research/ and https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/09/04/hopkins-launches-psychedelic-center/ https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/09/04/hopkins-launches-psychedelic-...). That said, Erowid, and anecdotal reports, can be very valuable as well.
brodo 7y ago
Strokes are _very_ common. It‘s the third most common cause for death (or something in that ballpark). A lot of the leading figures in psychedelics lived long lives. Incidentally, Alexander Shulgin also died at 88. Albert Hoffman lived to 104.
brooklyndude 7y ago
No.

loopz 7y ago

There's actually a quite interesting movie about Ram Dass, about his life before and after stroke. It became a revelation that continuing living required digging deeper, and made him question much of his past, acting like the famous yogis and fooling around. When high on spirit, one may become a bit arrogant and full of oneself. He got more or less to see himself as "no more enlightened" than others, realize more of being the same as others, conscious sameness. That being a yogi is about much more than being famous, wealthy or having good health, none of that actually. Lots of spiritual saints have had bad accidents and maladies in their life. Their power is often how to turn it to something deeper, meaningful, helping others and being inspirational - or just make a laugh about it. Ashtavakra was a total cripple (Ashtavakra means "8 knots" in the body), yet is studied and highly revered in India for his Gita.