> As for static libc: please don't do this. Preaching to the converted here, I'm a big fan of dynamic linking. It seems that while Go binaries are generally st

> As for static libc: please don't do this. Preaching to the converted here, I'm a big fan of dynamic linking. It seems that while Go binaries are generally statically linked (last time I checked, which was a while ago), that libc is generally dynamically linked for the reasons that you have stated, also also because some features like NSS require dynamic linking to work correctly. Disclaimer: I mostly program in C and C++, not Rust or Go (yet).