3 ms·
> If the match is close enough that a human would confirm it as well, and conduct an “interrogation”, then presumably facial recognition technology did not incr
by nyolfen 7y ago
> If the match is close enough that a human would confirm it as well, and conduct an “interrogation”, then presumably facial recognition technology did not incrementally add to the problem of mismatching since a human would also make the same false match.
it seems likely to me that cops might use it as justification for a fishing expedition, or TSA agents may just go along with it as a cover-your-ass measure
- SlowRobotAhead 7y ago“Sir do I smell marijuana in your vehicle?” “Sir, this dog detected something on your person” “Sir, the scanned detected an object under your shirt please step over here” “Sir, you’ve been flagged by this facial recognition software” ... agreed. I think this is better to head off before that last one can be abused.