so if I say something that is technically infeasible, I should be downvoted? How about instead somebody informs me that what I stated is infeasible with some su

so if I say something that is technically infeasible, I should be downvoted? How about instead somebody informs me that what I stated is infeasible with some supporting facts? That will educate me and the rest of HN. So, since you say disabling JS is infeasible.. to what extent? What websites work with JS disabled, what might I miss out on? Is it possible to compromise, perhaps a browser can be configured to whitelist certain JS APIs? Perhaps we create a JS-lite standard? I don't know. Let's talk about it though. I like that kind of discussion. It is worth noting that I have always had JS enabled, but I would like to hear the opinions and perspectives of everyone.