4 ms·
It was refreshing to get a notice about cookie settings which when ignored, accepted or rejected remained readily accessible (on mobile at least). Normally, you
by onei 7y ago
It was refreshing to get a notice about cookie settings which when ignored, accepted or rejected remained readily accessible (on mobile at least). Normally, you get to reject setting once and then it vanishes meaning you can't update your choice either way. It was a pleasant surprise to be able to change my mind.
- NullPrefix 7y ago>Normally, you get to reject setting once and then it vanishes meaning you can't update your choice either way. Funny how you phrase it. Normally dark websites lets you accept the setting and never show it to you again, so you wouldn't change your mind. If you reject it - you get a redirect or a nagging screen which lets you change your mind and accept.
- tempestn 7y agoHaving to have a separately implemented version of this on every website in the world is the dark pattern. Browsers already let you white- or black-list individual domains for cookies; it's crazy that every website design has to accommodate this redundant feature that is never going to be possible to implement perfectly for all use cases.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- SilasX 7y agoStill, I was annoyed at it being a floating header, covering up the bottom few lines. I’m confused the vast majority of “mobile optimized” sites don’t even have anyone look at the site in landscape mode.