3 ms·
What about the patent based on this observation filed and granted to the Secretary of the Navy? https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en https://paten
by rolltiide 7y ago
What about the patent based on this observation filed and granted to the Secretary of the Navy?
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en
- lammalamma25 7y agoI think Occam's Razor says a good lawyer convinced the patent office to make a bad decision. Could be wrong, but this is easily explained by incompetence.
- _underfl0w_ 7y agoThat sounds like Hanlon's Razor.
- rolltiide 7y agoWhat's the issue with this patent? It is a parallel construction of what was observed without the prior observation being specific enough for prior art. And if there was to be coercion or convincing, the US Navy Secretary would be good enough you'd think?