3 ms·
Fascism has a specific meaning and should not be abused to indicate a state form which you find disagreeable. There have not been that many true fascist states,
by Yetanfou 7y ago
Fascism has a specific meaning and should not be abused to indicate a state form which you find disagreeable. There have not been that many true fascist states, Italy under Mussolini and Spain under Franco are examples of such, Germany under the National Socialist party was variation on a fascist state. The Soviet Union under communist rule was not a fascist state although the ideologies have many similarities, the same goes for China under communist rule and the Russian Federation under Putin's oligarchy. Those who use the term fascist to indicate states like the United Kingdom under Boris Johnson or the United States of America under Donald Trump have no idea what fascism actually means. For one, it does not mean 'resistance against immigration from non-western states'.
Here's a good start on what Fascism is, the definition of the doctrine as declared by its originator, Benito Mussolini.
http://www.historyguide.org/europe/duce.html http://www.historyguide.org/europe/duce.html
More can be found in Britannica's article on the subject:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism
In short - and mostly from Britannica's definition, supported by Mussolini's words Fascism is characterised by an extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a 'Volksgemeinschaft' (German: “people’s community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation.
Even shorter would be 'a militaristic nationalist dictatorial ideology which subjugates the individual for the (perceived) good of the nation'. It is such a close cousin to Communism and Islamism (and other similarly structured doctrines) that this short characterisation also applies to those ideologies.
- ncmncm 7y agoDistinctions between Germany under Hitler, Russia under Stalin, or China under Mao are more or less sophistry. All produced similar results by similar means despite differences in details; principally, murder and enforced starvation of millions, and mass enslavement. China, anyway, did not adventure much beyond their borders (Tibet notwithstanding, and didn't), unless you consider that most of Chines territory was already under occupation.
- Yetanfou 7y agoThey're not sophistry and it is important to make these distinctions, if only because not doing so allows those who continue to profess allegiance to these ideologies to get away with it. As a case in point it should not come as a surprise that there are few places in the world where those who present themselves as 'National Socialist' or 'Fascist' are given a warm welcome. What should be surprising but is not is that this does not go for those who present themselves as 'Communist' or, more recently, 'Islamist'. This is made possible in part by the use of the term 'fascist' as a stand-in for all those unsavoury ideologies as it serves to wash them clean of the crimes committed in their name by allowing their proponents to claim that those who committed the crimes were not 'true' Communists or Islamists or any other -ists.
- ncmncm 7y agoIf those presenting as "communist" or "islamist" were shunned like nazis because they are all, effectively, fascists, that would not be an improvement? How not?