5 ms·
> Partially Encrypted Deep Learning using Functional Encryption I don't agree about this one. It does seem fundamental science to me.
by elcomet 7y ago
> Partially Encrypted Deep Learning using Functional Encryption
I don't agree about this one. It does seem fundamental science to me.
- b3kart 7y agoAnd here we see the problem with this particular way of splitting. Although I agree NeurIPS needs to be split up somehow.
- nabla9 7y agoEncrypting deep learning is problem for practical applications that require privacy. That's applied science.
- ses1984 7y agoHow do you suppose you're going to provide theoretical assurance of privacy and correctness without science?
- nabla9 7y agoMaybe I'm wrong but I see this as applied vs fundamental, not "without science" issue.
- elcomet 7y agoWell machine learning is applied science. But inside there are theoretical work (like encrypted machine learning or optimization theory) and practical work (like text2speech, or other tasks)
- Vervious 7y agoDisagree. Theory is always interested in building better, simpler protocols, asking questions about lower bounds and possibility. See almost all of fundamental crypto research.