4 ms·
I dont think there is a single scientifically demonstrated consequence of the climate changing we dont know how to deal with today.
by ThomPete 7y ago
I dont think there is a single scientifically demonstrated consequence of the climate changing we dont know how to deal with today.
- ncmncm 7y agoSo, therefore, don't do any of it? Denialism is fundamentally dishonest.
- ThomPete 7y agoWhat exactly is it I am denying. By all means? Please share.
- polotics 7y agoYou are denying our future inability to deal with consequences, not just in terms of knowing what to do, but in terms of having the ability: energy, organisation capable to cope with planet-wide relocation needs, game-theory pointing clearly to massive conflicts...
- ThomPete 7y agoWhat scientifically demonstrated consequence of climate change exactly is it we can't deal with?
- polotics 7y agoDo you assume we will always be able to use as many kWh per head as we do now? Please show your work, energy availability has started going down many places.
- ThomPete 7y agoI am assuming that we will be able to use much more kWh than we are today but not if we continue to chase insufficient technologies like windmill and solar energy. We haven't even started converting the universe into energy. Please show any evidence that we are running out of energy.
- polotics 7y agoThere are gigantic amounts of stats available. Start at jancovici.com but any half decent honest search on the web will show we're scraping the barrel of easy oil, and the rest follows. Why do you think shales and fracking have seen a boom, do you think this is the cheapest way to get oil/gas? Same for deep seas drilling. How do you propose we convert the universe into energy, more tokamak or stellerator? When/how will that work can you show any evidence that it will help, and by when?