3 ms·
Great feature. Though it feels like a UI misstep that the user had to use npm to switch between recording and browsing. A nicer solution could be a chrome exten
by wanderingstan 7y ago
Great feature. Though it feels like a UI misstep that the user had to use npm to switch between recording and browsing. A nicer solution could be a chrome extension button, or access the archived version via a synthetic domain. E.g. example.com.archived
- archivist1 7y agoThanks for compliment. I totally agree re misstep and want to improve that. Once the library server is implemented, you'll be able to browse to it (localhost:8080 or so) and access your archive from there. Nice idea on synthetic domain, that might yield another way to do.
- crooked-v 7y agoThere's also some 'magic' potential here to have a proxy that detects whether there's a live network interface or not (including some sanity checking against captive portals), passes through the live sites while recording when there is a connection, and serves from the last recorded versions when there isn't.
- daurnimator 7y agoSounds like a local squid proxy setup from the early 2000s...