Totally agree that many comments here indicate a deep misreading of the article. The article examined two viewpoints, one that scapegoats the tech industry and

Totally agree that many comments here indicate a deep misreading of the article. The article examined two viewpoints, one that scapegoats the tech industry and one that scapegoats the NIMBYs. They say no progress has been made in a decade as these two viewpoints are in a stalemate. Ironically the author seems to see hope and a way forward in initiatives by the technology industry itself. Maybe everyone here only read the passages that presented the point of view that was critical of the tech industry and not the parts that were critical of the NIMBYs, or the parts that praised the YIMBYs and the tech industry getting involved in a solution.