It's the same argument you here from the armchair critic of modern art, 'My child could do this.' And while it's right that a child could probably commit to th

It's the same argument you here from the armchair critic of modern art, 'My child could do this.' And while it's right that a child could probably commit to the brush strokes, it's certain that if you gave the same tools to the child, they wouldn't produce anything like it. And here, it's easy to say that you could easily produce this in CG using Blender and the like, if the artist knew what the final image would look like. But the final image is the product of the experimental process, which invited different possibilities to playing around with digital tools. An art teacher once told me, 'There's no right and wrong in art, just good and shit.' And 'good works of art', by my definition, tend to have a development process behind them, and not just whims of fraudulent genius, as some might believe.