4 ms·
Genuinely curious as to why you think they haven't aged a single day. Doesn't it depend on the point of reference? Earth is 500 light seconds from the Sun. So a
by 0xFFFE 7y ago
Genuinely curious as to why you think they haven't aged a single day.
Doesn't it depend on the point of reference? Earth is 500 light seconds from the Sun. So any photon hitting the eye is at least 500 seconds old. Hypothetically speaking, if a human were to be born on the Sun's surface and reach earth at the speed of light, he/she is at least 500 seconds old on Earth's clock?
- pacificmint 7y agoSure, but from the frame of reference of the human it’s not. If the human would travel at 99% of the speed of light, then time dilation would make it a lot less than 500 seconds. If an object moves at the speed of light, Mathematically no time is passing.
- mathieuh 7y agoIt's also why we can detect muons on Earth, a particle that would have decayed by the time it reaches us if its age depended on our frame of reference.
- 0xFFFE 7y agoI looked up after your reply, they decay by losing energy based on the matter they interact with. So in the vacuum of space they can travel great distances as long as they don't interact with the matter. Source: https://cosmic.lbl.gov/SKliewer/Cosmic_Rays/Muons.htm https://cosmic.lbl.gov/SKliewer/Cosmic_Rays/Muons.htm
- lokedhs 7y agoYou are misreading the document. The muons are created in the top of the atmosphere and decays after a very short amount of time. The point is that they decay so fast that they shouldn't be able to reach the ground. They manage to do that because time passes much slower for the muon. Or to put it differently, from the point of view of the muon the thickness of the atmosphere has been compressed to become much smaller than from the point of view of an observer on Earth.
- 0xFFFE 7y agoYou are right, I misread the document. I stand corrected.
- 0xFFFE 7y agoYes I agree, from the object's frame of reference no time passes.