4 ms·
I don't see how this is worse than most other things that hit the home page. It's interesting, is an in-depth article, is tech-related, and is something most pe
by shaklee3 7y ago
I don't see how this is worse than most other things that hit the home page. It's interesting, is an in-depth article, is tech-related, and is something most people recognize. And the fact that it's not just cgi is interesting, regardless of whether you think it should be or not.
- iudqnolq 7y agoThat's what I thought, and why I posted it.
- bdcravens 7y agoBut where will tomorrow's WeWork, Uber, and Elon bashing articles go? /s
- greatgib 7y agoThis is just my personal opinion, but it looks more bullshit marketing speech than interesting technical content this article. First part until the numbers is clearly marketing bullshit blabla: "the logo of windows (speaking in fact only of the wallpaper...) is the most important thing in the world, it saves kittens and perform heart surgery..." Then, long text to say: we took a colored projector and black scotch and voilà. No explanation of why it would be better than doing it digitally. And most of it, the technique is far from new and they did a very basic thing with it. Some people mix lights to create images and all. My point is that if it was not related to something famous (Microsoft), no one would have cared