> was creating python 3 a good decision for python community? ... I know that evaluating this kind of thing is hard I don't think there is any question here: P

> was creating python 3 a good decision for python community? ... I know that evaluating this kind of thing is hard I don't think there is any question here: Python 3 is a complete disaster. Years and years of engineering effort wasted on changing string libraries. Sadly, the Python leadership refuses to acknowledge the failing, perhaps because such an acknowledgement would challenge their omnipotence ... it would, and it should.