I had a look at FreeRTOS for a project, and liked the architecture with support for concurrent tasks and all the tooling included in Atmel Studio... I would not

I had a look at FreeRTOS for a project, and liked the architecture with support for concurrent tasks and all the tooling included in Atmel Studio... I would not let something as superficial as the naming conventions influence my tooling choice, but for sure was left wondering who and why in the world would opt for such awkward and (almost objectively) ugly names for their rtos project. Seems like if they tried hard to join all the worst things from all worlds: mix your ALLCAPS with lower case, add a pinch of CamelCase mingled with some snake_case, and top it with a confusing blend of semantic + sintactic prefix notation. Seriously wtf were they thinking about? EDIT: Adding the first example that I could find, which already shows all of the mentioned "features" (scroll down for the code): https://www.freertos.org/Hardware-independent-RTOS-example.html https://www.freertos.org/Hardware-independent-RTOS-example.h...