4 ms·

Your description of the individual missed out, chief caller-outer of pedo guys who has a penchant for legally smoking a spliff or tweeting under other influence

Your description of the individual missed out, chief caller-outer of pedo guys who has a penchant for legally smoking a spliff or tweeting under other influences, whilst eschewing world dominance. However, I am ambivalent, not only because the person has not yet been exposed as doing 'things' which might be considered deeply unsavoury ─ even by the lax standards or sexual mores that define people in this class. But he continues to make some progress, in the vein of unreasonable people having the will to bend the world around them, rather than being pliable to it. This is not an endorsement nor does it express my consent or brings me joy to say it, but somebody has to do it, so the others can follow.

xedeon 7y ago
> This is not an endorsement nor does it express my consent or brings me joy to say it, but somebody has to do it, so the others can follow. Thankfully, not everyone thinks they are holier than thou while also spewing vitriol. Try to think critically perhaps? Only fools follow. Also, Unsworth lost his case and is now on the hook for legal fees. Even his OWN lawyer admitted he was wrong and agreed with the verdict after some reflecting: https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370 https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370
- johnnycab 7y ago
  >Even his OWN lawyer admitted he was wrong and agreed with the verdict after some reflecting: https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370 https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370 You could not have picked a worse example to illustrate your point. If your intention was to defend the person by admonishing me and meting out sage advice as a form of punishment, perhaps it would have been wise to read past the first tweet, whose contents you crudely paraphrased. If you unroll the thread and read the following tweets, you will find that it presents a litany of events ─ adding to an already chequered past of a man, who has a colourful presence on the platform, which has been documented comprehensively elsewhere in the media.
  - xedeon 7y ago
    “Sage advice”? Wow. Get off your pedestal.

xedeon 7y ago

> This is not an endorsement nor does it express my consent or brings me joy to say it, but somebody has to do it, so the others can follow. Thankfully, not everyone thinks they are holier than thou while also spewing vitriol. Try to think critically perhaps? Only fools follow. Also, Unsworth lost his case and is now on the hook for legal fees. Even his OWN lawyer admitted he was wrong and agreed with the verdict after some reflecting: https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370 https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370

johnnycab 7y ago
>Even his OWN lawyer admitted he was wrong and agreed with the verdict after some reflecting: https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370 https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1204206188189114370 You could not have picked a worse example to illustrate your point. If your intention was to defend the person by admonishing me and meting out sage advice as a form of punishment, perhaps it would have been wise to read past the first tweet, whose contents you crudely paraphrased. If you unroll the thread and read the following tweets, you will find that it presents a litany of events ─ adding to an already chequered past of a man, who has a colourful presence on the platform, which has been documented comprehensively elsewhere in the media.
- xedeon 7y ago
  “Sage advice”? Wow. Get off your pedestal.