5 ms·
There is a lot wrong with this article, including, no definition of what "commodity hardware" means. Would it have been that difficult to show how to run "open
by patrickgzill 16y ago
There is a lot wrong with this article, including, no definition of what "commodity hardware" means.
Would it have been that difficult to show how to run "openssl speed aes -multi 4" or whatnot so people could test on their own hardware?
Perhaps the recognition that even older hardware such as the quad core Opteron 2358 I tested on, delivers 350Mbytes/sec of AES256, would tend to undermine their argument.
350Mbytes/second of network throughput is roughly 3.5 Gbits/second (I usually multiple bytes * 10 to account for overhead); far beyond what most people would ever ask of a single server.
(this same hw does 900+ RSA 2048 bit signs/s, just for reference)
- Waywocket 16y ago>I usually multiple bytes * 10 to account for overhead I don't disagree with your point, but this bit is faulty. If you want to account for some overhead you should multiply by a number lower than 8, not higher.
- __david__ 16y agoNo, he's right here--just looking at it from a different perspective. He's saying "it takes roughly 3.5Gbit/s of bandwidth to support 350MB/s of real data transfer."